Suiting Up
0
Writers of cop fiction must make the hero of their novel different from other characters. Different doesn’t necessarily have to mean better than, either. For example, some authors create sloppily dressed detectives. Remember Columbo? At the other end of the spectrum, private eye Nick Charles, in Dashiell Hammett’s The Thin Man was impeccably dressed and wore an aura of sophistication. Both values can be used – or abused – as the author sees fit.
Let’s examine an “A-Jay, Squared Away” cop (or fire fighter, paramedic, dispatcher . . .) first. He’s a trooper with a state police agency. It’s summertime and he lives near the beach. After a 3-day break with facial scruff to show for it, he’s in a faded T, shorts and flip flops. He’ll return to work on that evening’s graveyard shift. He begins the transformation from beach bum to beat cop with a power nap at 5:00 p.m., followed by a three mile jog, a shower and a shave.
7:00 p.m.: high protein, low residue dinner with the family.
7:40 p.m.: follow-up on the kids’ homework, then play Parcheesi with them before bed time.
9:00 p.m.: Play with the wife awhile (perhaps necessitating another shower), then begin suiting-up.
As he breaks out a can of Brasso to clean the brass ornaments on his uniform, he’s getting into game mode. He knows that shiny brass and impeccably polished shoes will not only earn him brownie points with the boss, it can cause a potential adversary to think twice before taking on this cop. As the trooper puts on his ballistic vest he’s becoming more aware of the threats out there, and when he buttons the last button of his crisply starched uniform shirt, he’s turning third base and going for the final stretch in a deadly-serious game. Now he heads for home plate as he checks his weapon. He carries a .40 automatic pistol, and after carefully checking to ensure it’s not loaded, he quickly breaks it down and inspects its major components. That done, he assembles his weapon in less time than it took to strip it and works the action until he’s satisfied the weapon’s working properly. He checks his ammunition next, visually inspecting each round for nicks, or dents in the primers. Sure, he’s checked the same ammo dozens of times but he’s methodical rather than obsessive. Afterward he takes the weapon outside and points the barrel at a special sand pit that he’s constructed well away from his childrens’ bedrooms, and loads the pistol. He slides it into a highly-polished holster, then goes inside to inspect himself in the mirror.
He’s satisfied with what he sees – he’s strac, a military term that means squared-away . . . ready to stand a colonel’s inspection should the colonel appear so late at night. But it’s not the colonel that he’s out to impress. In fact, he’s not out to impress anyone. His goal is to present an image to the antagonistic forces that say’s, “I’m fit, my uniform and weapon are crisp, clean and charged, so don’t try to take me on.” He’s aware of studies that revealed potential cop-killers’ thought processes: when bad guys consider taking on a cop in a gunfight, they’ll literally check the cop’s uniform for cleanliness, his shooting badge for ranking – “Marksman” and below, and the cop-killer might decide he has a chance; “Expert” or “Master,” and the bad guy will almost always stand down.
Sometime later while on patrol, he passes through a medium-sized municipality. He sees five local police cars pulled up adjacent to an alley. The trooper stops. Five cops are confronting two twentysomething college-type guys. The cops are the opposite of strac – their leather hasn’t seen polish in months, their uniforms are not pressed and they’re not in very good physical shape. Other than being an average of six feet tall each, they seem at a loss in dealing with two young guys who’re having fun pushing the cops’ buttons. All that changes when our trooper pulls to a stop. The two guys clam-up. They watch, and when the trooper puts on his stetson, the guys begin shifting from foot to foot. Then when the trooper asks in a low voice, “What seems to be the problem?” the two malcontents trade glances. The trooper stares them down. “I believe these officers are giving you commands. You’d better listen to them.”
Instead of complying, the guys look at the officers and jeer. Bad move. The trooper opens his door and steps out – and even at five foot seven and 125 pounds, he projects a “don’t mess with me” image. The twentysomethings note the knife-edge creases on the trooper’s shirt sleeves; they don’t want to get too close to those creases either, lest they cut themselves on them. They assess the trooper’s calm manner, his professional tone of voice and lack of name-calling, put-downs or other immature actions. They think, if he’s this sharp, he probably knows judo . . . or something. The two guys turn around and place their hands behind their backs without being told. After the local cops handcuff them, the trooper resumes his patrol. What was his secret to success? Image? Projection of force? Force multiplier? Whatever you choose to call it, this is how some first responders are able to suit up in order to stay alive. They might not be tall or muscular, but in that uniform they are – as the trooper has heard so often from members of the public, “You might be short, but in that uniform you’re ten feet tall.”
The opposite: cops who haven’t checked their weapons in so long, the ammunition is green with verdigris. Their uniforms haven’t seen an iron in ages – possibly not since the iron age – and forget about polish on that leather. Physically, they’re imposing. And yet, adversaries aren’t afraid of them. Sure, the officer might easily prevail if a confrontation turns physical – but it doesn’t have to reach that level . . . not if they’d suited up and gotten into their game. But it doesn’t mean they don’t know how to play the game. There are vast numbers of frayed and frazzled cops, because their minds process things differently, are living examples of Columbo, Wyatt Earp and Nick Charles combined.
And that’s the great thing for writers – there’s a wealth of wonderful things that can be done to set a protagonist cop apart from his or her peers. Simply decide how you want them to suit up, and what being “strac” or not can take that character, and write on.
The New Breed
0
A new TV show that first aired in 1961promised viewers insight into the modern cop. The New Breed starred Leslie Nielsen. It ran for one season. Exactly ten years later, veteran cop Joe Wambaugh’s debut novel The New Centurions hit the bookstores. It blended old school cops with young rookies and struck a balance of sorts. Later, it was made into a movie starring George C. Scott. Today we’ll examine the newest New Breed – those twentysomething cops fresh out of college and ready to take on the world.
To start with, most old-timers yearn for those “back in the day” days of fond rememberances. They’re quick to point out to the younger guys & gals how much tougher it was “back then,” and how much more fun the job was. But there has been a shift or sorts that’s worth investigation, and that’s the passing of a bench mark, and a main culprit is the new breed of technology. Sure, cops 150 years ago went to street boxes to check in by phone and receive new calls. And yes, that transitioned into phones on each detective’s desk, along with radios in the patrol cars. In time, police cars were air-conditioned offices on wheels, with laptops, writing lamps and cup holders.
But the past decade has seen techno-marvels that even the geeks can’t always keep up with. Well, maybe they can – but only because they’re smarter than the rest of us. Or smarter than me, at any rate. Now the new breed can sit in their patrol car and pass the time sending email or text messages to their friends. They can crank up the iPod, adjust the seats, kick off their shoes and wait for something to happen. Meanwhile – and this is based upon hearsay - they’ve got more important stuff to handle . . . those emails and text messages, for example.
While this observation is arguable, it isn’t a singular conclusion. More and more cops of the older ilk complain of a new breed incapable of lifting their eyes from their computer screens long enough to take note of what’s taking place a mere five feet away. These observations have already found their way into literatire. In Black & White, by veteran cop Wes Albers, the hero is an old beat cop with a new rookie to train. The “kid” can’t be bothered to look, listen and learn. He’s got another agenda – his text messages. Later however, he begins to see how much he’s missing and learns to embrace at least a few of the old-timer’s ways. 
This is good for the authors out there. We’re presented with an entirely new corps of first responders to mix into a plot line. For example, the rookie who never takes the time to get out of her cruiser to interact with the street people; the new guy who learns nothing about being a cop from his field training officer, because what is there to learn that he can’t find on the ‘net? It doesn’t mean a writer should be judgmental, but authors shouldn’t shirk from using what they see . . . or think they see. After all, technology has its virtues – after all, it’s what gets this article out there.
Cops & Writers
0
A lot of my first responder colleagues mention their interest in writing about the things they’ve seen over the years… The other day, I heard from no fewer than three – a fire fighter and two cops – who wanted to put the proverbial pen to paper. So I’m posting an article that I did about nine months ago. Here it is:
I was chatting with an old friend the other day when he mentioned an interest in writing. He’s a retired state police sergeant with a lot of stories and experiences waiting for the novel and the non-fiction articles he wants to churn out. But when he asked a few questions about the literary world, I realized I’d neglected one of the two raison d’êtres that form the core of this website—to serve as an authoritative source for authors who write about cops, but also to provide assistance to first responders who want to become authors. So here’s a primer:
- Take a creative writing course. Don’t mimic my mistake by thinking that because you turn out written reports that are clear, concise and to the point, this skill will transfer to writing a book that will attract a commercial publisher’s interest.
- Learn about the use of clichés. Here’s one: “Don’t give up your day job.” It’s used often in the writing world. Why? Because there are only about forty writers in the USA who make their living solely through their novels, and their names are Stephen King, Danielle Steele, Rick Anderson . . . well okay, maybe not me but I can dream, can’t I? In fact, we should dream. Dreams are part of the drive that will eventually get us published.
- Back to those clichés. A fundamental rule in those creative writing courses is that they must be avoided at all costs.
- Attend writers’ conferences. There are some excellent ones throughout the USA, and one of the best I’ve seen is the Southern California Writers’ Conference, held each President’s Day weekend in Sunny Sandy Eggo.
Writers’ conferences let new authors meet editors, agents, publishers and other writers who’ve been published. Remember the part about dreaming—you’ll meet publishers; you’ll see for yourself that your work can appear on bookstore shelves. Here’s a link to the SCWC conference: http://www.writersconference.com/index.html
- Put on a suit of armor. You’ll need it, because before a publisher will buy your work they’re going to edit the heck out of it, and you can’t take it personally. There’s a valid phrase: “Writing is an art, but publishing is a business,” and for the first to merge into the other, authors and publishers alike must pay heed to the market; what does it want, and what will it bear.
- Attend writer’s workshops. Like the dead people walking around in Sixth Sense, “they’re everywhere.” Workshop writers form small groups and do round-robins. Each author reads from his or her manuscript for a few minutes while the others jot notes. Then the others critique your work. But bear in mind that it’s not unlike going to a doctor—if you go in for a check-up and the doctor discovers a cancerous tumor, you’d want to know about it, or it can’t be cured. The same applies to workshops—you’ve got to know if your manuscript is riddled with cancer, otherwise you can’t fix it. That’s the theory, now here’s a caveat: unfortunately, jealousy is a common trait and there are those who’ll trash your work not out of objectivity but to put you down, when in fact your stuff was damn good. To assist any writer in a workshop, use the rule of three: if three people report essentially the same opinions, listen to them.
That’s a start. But there’s more.
- Whether you’re contemplating a novel or a short, non-fiction piece for a magazine, be sure to begin with an idea about what you want to say. It should be an idea that can be stated in one, or possibly two sentences. It doesn’t matter if you’re turning out a men’s action story or a romance or even an article on accident-reconstruction. You’ve got to form an idea that will develop the theme of your work. So let’s examine that police procedural that you’ve finished: it’s full of action, adventure and even a little romance. But it’s summarized this way, often as a question: “How far will a cop go to protect the people who mean the most to him?” That’s it. The core of your story or article. It forms the thread you’ll weave throughout the manuscript, and by the end you’ll have answered the question by showing your readers just how far a cop will go—even if the hero dies in the end.
- Seek and use the wealth of resources that are out there. For example, there’s Writer’s Digest—not to be confused with the annual Writer’s Market—but each is invaluable.
Freelance editors can shape your story for you, and find the bumps in the road that you, the author, are too close to see by yourself.
Writing is evolutionary. An editor friend recently sent me a posting about new rules of punctuation.
Read Story Engineering by Larry Brooks, arguably the best book out there on how to structure a story that will sell. Remember: writing is an art, publishing is a business.
- Don’t take rejections personally. I know an author who has had more than forty of her young adult novels published. Three were made into TV movies, and one of those won an Emmy. And yet she still received rejections of new manuscripts all the time.
Another friend has a proven track record of published novels—including some in the Buffy the Vampire series—and you guessed it: she still gets rejections slips. But it’s important to read the rejections, because often an agent or editor will take time from their packed schedules to write a personal note, and tell you that while they loved the concept, the theme and the opening line, they still have to keep in mind what the market will and will not bear. Again, publishing is a business.
- Speaking of rejections, use caution in showing your manuscript to family and close friends. They’ll often tell you what you want to hear, rather than risk conflict by pointing out that the manuscript . . . just isn’t any good.
Finally, persevere. If you’ve worked the mean streets or manned the fire hose or patched up the trauma victims, and you’ve a wealth of stories to tell, then pick an idea and shape it into a story that will sell. But it takes time. And it takes a dream.
“I’m a cop, not a police officer.”
0
For an author to nail a cop character in a manuscript, it’s necessary to understand the difference between what a cop is, as compared to a “police officer.” This realization of what makes for a seasoned cop can (yes, I’ll say it) spice up your work. Here’s a primer:
Cops don’t work for a living. Rather, they get paid money to do something they love – something that their personality has pushed them into becoming. On the other hand, all too often police officers are in it for the steady pay, the bennies and a retirement at the end of their twenty years.
While police officers expend greater effort getting out of work instead of just doing their job, cops inherently understand that they’ve got to take the drudge work along with the pulse-pounding high-speed pursuits. That means clearing from roll call as soon as possible to begin answering a backlog of barking dog complaints, graffiti violations and passed-out drunks. It means monitoring the radio so that when another officer responds to a call, the cop will automatically start in that direction to see if he or she can assist the other officer.
When they’re not responding to calls, cops turn to proactive patrol. They know their turf and have a working knowledge of who belongs in a neighborhood, and who doesn’t. Cops realize that taking down a street corner pusher can yield information that leads to the resolution of bigger crimes. Police officers meanwhile look for places to hide whenever there’s a lull in calls.
Most departments expect their officers to make traffic stops. It’s a part of their duties and if anyone thinks that police officers have a monthly quota of tickets to write, then they’ve got it turned around. Police officers are required to turn in at a minimum number of citations and warnings – but simply to prove they’re doing what they are getting paid to do. A worker in an automobile assembly plant has to account for their work; police officers must demonstrate that they’re doing theirs. But the “quota” is paltry compared to the number of tickets true cops write on their own initiative, and the quota itself becomes a mirror of laxity for lazy police officers. As an example, I know a cop who worked for a large department. One day his sergeant told him, “You need to make more traffic stops.” My friend said, “Yes, sir. No problem. How many do you want me to make?” The sergeant replied, “At least six per week . . . but that can include written warnings.” My friend the cop looked sidelong at the sergeant. “But, Sarge . . . I’m already making fifteen to twenty stops each day.” As it turned out, the office copies of that cop’s tickets and warnings were being misfiled. But this illustrates a significant difference between cops and police officers – this cop couldn’t understand how someone paid to do their job could not make ten or twenty traffic stops a day. “It’s so damn easy,” he said. “Go to a street corner, park your patrol car and stand next to it. Then wave over every car that fails to come to a complete halt at the stop sign and give the driver a written warning . . . in ten minutes you’ve got fifteen stops.” He didn’t add the other part – doing cop work makes the hours fly past, and the end of the day’s tour of duty arrives before you realize it.
There are other lists . . . other comparison’s between what makes a cop a cop, and a police officer an employee who collects a paycheck. But in closing, there are two items to add to the list, and that’s the respect given a cop; the tacit acknowledgement that he or she does good work. And when a street cop is permitted – and sometimes directed – to handle a homicide investigation until the under-staffed detectives can take it over the next day, then you’ve seen what it is to be a cop.
The final item is what the cop sees when they glance at a mirror long after retirement. They see satisfaction. They see someone who participated in life with all its rough spots, and yet they come out shining like a diamond. Don’t believe it? Then just check their genuine smile that’s reflected back to them in that mirror.
Book Review: “Black & White”
0
If you’re a writer seeking sources that provide authenticity to your cop characters, if you’re a cop who loves to read about what you do for a living, or if you simply enjoy a great book about cops, Black & White, written by San Diego Police Sergeant Wes Albers, has just been published by Zova Books.
From the moment I read the first sentence I couldn’t turn the pages fast enough – and that’s a compliment I don’t often make. Black & White is a fast-paced, deeply introspective story about a street cop who is dispatched to a gruesome homicide scene – and nothing in his life or yours will ever be the same again. Officer John Hatch has already seen it all, and here he casts a jaundiced eye at an injustice that is felt rather than seen; understood without complete comprehension; compelled into action without wanting to be – except that his soul won’t let him turn away. Not from this one.
As I began reading I was instantly reminded of Saving Private Ryan, Band of Brothers and The Pacific. All three are productions of the Tom Hanks/Steven Spielberg team, and all three were produced under the critical guidance of retired Marine Captain Dale Dye. Sergeant Wes Albers mirrors Captain Dye’s attention to detail, and the result is an authentic, tell-it-like-it-is storyline that embraces realism in all its shades of black and white. Of course, it’s only natural to compare Wes Albers to that other great teller of cop tales, Joe Wambaugh. The similarities are striking, the gallows humor even deeper than anything written by Wambaugh, and the reader empathy is just as super-charged. Get your head out of the computer screen, open Wes Alber’s Black & White, and hold on for a page turning, tire squealing ride.
Black & White, by Wes Albers. Published 2012, by Zova Books, 244 Pages